Monday 14 November, 2011

State Level Paper Presentation

Guys this was the seminar prepared by my dad on LEADERSHIP FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT last week, which my he presented in state level seminar. The paper presented, got registered in my dad's name. I am so happy that one more time I have put my sincere effort to make my dad famous in the college and the whole university.


Abstract

Too often today quality has become synonymous with the latest government stricture on standards, examination success, school performance, league tables or part of the latest party political pronouncements on education before an election. I do not say this with any sense of cynicism. Rather I sense it is the way of the world. Once the message of quality had become popularized, there was always a danger of it becoming vulgarized.

TQM as a management model, with its emphasis on leadership, strategy, teamwork, rigorous analysis and self-assessment, has a universal message. And it has always been a philosophy for the long haul rather than a short-term fix. It is now required more than ever in our world of continuous change.











LEADERSHIP FOR IMPLIMENTATION OF TQM


By
Shri.L.R.Kulkarni
Associate Professor
Kamala Baliga College of Education, Kumta



1.     Introduction

‘Commitment means much more than giving an annual
speech on how important quality is to our school. It
requires unending enthusiasm and devotion to quality
improvement. It calls for an almost fanatic promotion of
and attention to new ways to do things. It requires constant
review of each and every action.’

Stanley Spanbauer, A Quality System for Education

Total quality is a passion and a way of life for those organizations that live its message. The question is how to generate the passion and the pride required to generate quality in education. Peters and Austin researched the characteristics of excellence for their book A Passion for Excellence (1986). Their research led them to the belief that what makes the difference is leadership. They argue strongly for a particular style of leadership to lead the quality revolution—a style to which they have given the acronym MBWA or ‘management by walking about’. A
passion for excellence cannot be communicated from behind the office desk. MBWA emphasizes both the visibility of leaders and their understanding and feeling for the front-line and the processes of the institution. This style of leadership is about communicating the vision and the values of the institution to others, and getting out among the staff and the customers and experiencing the service for themselves.


2.     The Educational Leader

Peters and Austin gave specific consideration to educational leadership in a chapter entitled ‘Excellence in School Leadership’. They see the educational leader as needing the following attributes:

·         Vision and symbols—the head teacher or principal must communicate the institution’s values to the staff, pupils and students and the wider community.
·         Management by walking about is the required leadership style for any institution.
·         ‘For the kids’—this is their educational equivalent to ‘close to the customer’. It ensures that the institution has a clear focus on its primary customers.
·          Autonomy, experimentation, and support for failure—educational leaders must encourage innovation among their staff and be prepared for the failures that inevitably accompany innovation.
·         Create a sense of ‘family’—the leader needs to create a feeling of community among the institution’s pupils, students, parents, teachers and support staff.
·        Sense of the whole, rhythm, passion, intensity, and enthusiasm—these are the essential personal qualities required of the educational leader.

The significance of leadership for undertaking the transformation to TQM should not be underestimated. Without leadership at all levels of the institution the improvement process cannot be sustained. Commitment to quality has to be a prime role for any leader. It is for this reason that TQM is said to be a top-down process. It has been estimated that 80 per cent of quality initiatives fail in the first two years. The main reason for failure is lack of senior management backing and commitment. Quality improvement is too important to leave to the quality coordinator. To succeed in education TQM requires strong and purposeful leadership. Typically, managers in non-TQM organizations spend 30 per cent of their time in dealing with systems failure, complaints and ‘firefighting’. As TQM saves that time, managers have more time to lead, plan ahead, develop new ideas and work closely with customers.


3.     Communicating a vision

Senior management must give the lead and provide vision and inspiration. In TQM organizations all managers have to be leaders and champions of the quality process. They need to communicate the mission and cascade it throughout the institution. Many managers, particularly middle managers, may find total quality difficult to accept and to implement. It involves a change in the management mind-set as well as a change of role. It is a change from the ‘I’m in charge’ mentality to that of manager as supporter and leader of front-line staff. The function of leadership is to enhance the quality of learning and to support the staff who delivers it. While this sounds obvious, it is not always the way management functions are viewed. Traditional notions of status can lie uneasily with the total quality approach. TQM turns the traditional institution on its head and inverts the hierarchy of functions. It empowers the teachers and can provide them with greater scope for initiative. It is for this reason that it is often said of TQM institutions that they require less management and more leadership.


4.     The role of the leader in developing a quality culture

What is the role of the leader in an institution undertaking a total quality initiative? No list of attributes says it all, but there are major functions that all leaders must undertake; these include:
·         a vision for the institution;
·         a clear commitment to quality improvement;
·         an ability to communicate the quality message;
·         meeting customer needs;
·         ensuring that the voices of customers are heard;
·         leading staff development;
·         a no blame culture—most quality problems are the result of management and policies and not the failings of staff;
·         leading innovation;
·         ensuring that organizational structures have clearly defined responsibilities and provide the maximum delegation compatible with accountability;
·         a commitment to the removal of artificial barriers, whether they be organizational or cultural;
·         building effective effective teams;
·         developing appropriate mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating success.


5.     Empowering teachers

A key aspect of the leadership role in education is to empower teachers to give them the maximum opportunity to improve the learning of their students. Stanley Spanbauer, the former President of Fox Valley Technical College in Wisconsin who took a lead in introducing TQM into vocational education in the United States, argues that:

in a quality-based approach, school leadership relies on the
empowerment of teachers and others involved in the teaching/
learning process. Teachers share in decision-making and assume
greater responsibilities. They are given more power to act and
greater autonomy in almost everything they do.

Spanbauer, in his A Quality System for Education (1992), has put forward a plan for leadership to create a new educational environment. He argues that educational leaders should guide and assist others to develop a similar set of characteristics. This encourages shared responsibility and a style that will engender an interactive working environment. He visualizes a leadership style where leaders ‘must walk and talk quality and understand that change happens by degree, not by decree’. Leaders have a pivotal role in guiding teachers and administrators to work for and in concert with their client groups. Spanbauer’s model is one of leadership for empowerment. His conclusions are:

·         Involve teachers and all staff in problem-solving activities, using basic scientific methods and the principles of statistical quality and process control.
·         Ask them how they think about things and how projects can be handled rather than telling them how they will happen.
·         Share as much management information as possible to help foster their commitment.
·         Ask staff which systems and procedures are preventing them from delivering quality to their customers—students, parents, co-workers.
·         Understand that the desire for meaningful improvement of teachers is not compatible with a top-down approach to management.
·         Rejuvenate professional growth by moving responsibility and control for professional development directly to the teachers and technical workers.
·         Implement systematic and continued communication among everyone involved in the school.
·         Develop skills in conflict resolution, problem solving and negotiations while displaying greater tolerance for and appreciation of conflict.
·         Be helpful without having all the answers and without being condescending.
·         Provide education in quality concepts and subjects such as team building, process management, customer service, communication and leadership.
·         Model, by personally exhibiting desired characteristics and spending time walking around, listening to teachers and other customers.
·         Learn to be more like a coach and less like a boss.
·         Provide autonomy and allow risk taking while being fair and compassionate.
·         Engage in the delicate balancing act of ensuring quality to external customers (students, parents, taxpayers), while at the same time paying attention to the needs of internal customers (teachers, board members, and other co-workers).


Bibilography

1.      Total Quality Management in Education, Third edition, By Edward Sallis.
2.      Total quality management in education - Marmar Mukhopadhyay
3.      http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol21109/8.Pour & Yeshodhara.pdf
4.      Total quality management and education, By Jens J. Dahlgaard, Kai Kristensen & Gopal K. Kanji

No comments: